According to nahapiet and ghoshal 1998 social capital is multidimensional and consists of three dimensions. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage janine nahapiet templeton college, university of oxford sumantra ghoshal london business school scholars of the theory of the firm have begun to emphasize the sources and conditions of what has. Nov 30, 2017 prior research suggests that the coevolution of social capital and knowledge underpin a firms competitive advantage. On the other hand, the definition of nahapiet and ghoshal 1998, that social capital is the sum of the actual and potential resources embedded within, available through, and derived from the network of relationships possessed by an individual or social unit p. We argue that social capital provides access to external. Cognitive social capital is the shared language and codes that provide the foundation for communication gooderham 2007. However, as putnam 1995 recently has observed, social capital is not a unidimensional concept, and, while sharing a common interest in how relational resources aid the conduct of social affairs, the different authors on this topic have tended to focus on different facets of social capital. The figure is a road map through the next few pages, and a reminder that beneath the general agreement about social capital as a metaphor lie a variety. Social capital comprises three distinct dimensions. Social capital and the creation of knowledge 121107 tmp. Dimensions of social capital structural, cognitive, and. Knowledge, social capital, and grassroots development. This supports nahapiet and ghoshal s 1998 1 observation that social capital involves complex interrelations between the three dimensions. Second, we contribute to the theory of human capital by considering its task.
Introduction social capital in the area of business has emerged as the focus of many researches since technology and. Social capitals contribution is derived from both intra and interorganizational relationships. The development of social capital in the collaboration. In a recent article, nahapiet and ghoshal 1997 presented a theoretical model of how social capital may facilitate value creation by firms. A proposed management response framework for competitive advantage based on knowledge growth. Using the three dimensions of social capital proposed by nahapiet and ghoshal 1998, it is evident that in this transition, structural social capital is still the most influential in building and maintaining social capital. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organization. Nahapiet j ghoshal s 1998 academy of management 266 the. Contextualising social capital in online brand communities. A social capital perspective on the role of human resources. Cognitive social capital refers to resources that provide shared.
Organizations with a lot of social capital have been found to exclude actors or made onboarding more difficult for new members morrow, 1999. The research further hypothesizes that a firms ability to create and utilize social capital contributes to performance differences among firms. Nahapiet and ghoshal 1998, for example, posit that social capital facilitates the development of intellectual capital and contributes to the competitive advantage of an organization by providing the opportunity, anticipation, motivation, and capability of knowledge. Here, we test a theory of human and social capital in which joint effects on performance are proposed. Although there are various academic definitions of social capital, for andrissen and gubbins 2009, it refers to relationships. Social capital, organizational learning capability, and. According to nahapiet and ghoshal 1998 three key components constitute organizational social capital. What drives electronic wordofmouth on social networking. Development and validation of a workplace social capital. Social capitals structural dimension refers to the structure or general fabric of an individuals or firms networks of relationships batjargal, 2003.
Organizational social capital scale based on nahapiet and ghosal. Nahapiet and ghoshal 1998, for example, posit that social capital facilitates the development of intellectual capital and contributes to the competitive advantage of an organization by providing the opportunity, anticipation, motivation, and. Social capital is often used to refer to the charac. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage janine nahapiet. The authors provide a description, based on empirical and conceptual studies, of how social. The role of social capital in virtual teams and organisations. The structural dimension stresses the configuration of the network arling 2006, p. However, as putnam 1995 recently has observed, social capital is not a unidimensional concept, and, while sharing a common interest in how relational resources aid the conduct of social affairs, the different authors on this topic have tended to focus on different facets of social. The structural dimension of social capital describes the. In particular, nahapiet and ghoshal 1998 propose that social capital is an important facilitator for the sharing of knowledge and, ultimately, a source of superior performance. The negative effects of social capital in organizations. The cognitive dimension differentiates the re sources that variously provide, shared representa tions, interpretations, and systems of meaning among parties nahapiet and ghoshal 1998, p.
The effects of social capital and community support on. The bulk of recent work on sc in organization studies. Due to social capitals influence upon the conditions needed for exchange and combination, social capital aids in the creation of intellectual capital. Organizational social capital, scale development, nahapiet and ghosal model, likert scale, scale validation. However, the downside of social capital has to be acknowledged as well.
The contemporary discourse on social capital builds still on nahapiet and ghoshal s 1998 threedimensional model, which is presented in figure 1. Social capital theory an overview sciencedirect topics. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational. Social capital thus comprises both the network and the assets that may be mobilized. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The relationship between social capital and operational. Social capital metaphor figure 1 is an overview of social capital in metaphor and network structure. In the first part of the paper the nahapiet and ghoshal model is formalized, before hypotheses on the potential impact of organizational social capital on performance are proposed. Lin, 2001, is often argued to possess such characteristics and thus to make a positive contribution to a firms outcomes nahapiet and ghoshal, 1998. Structural social capital may be characterised by the size of the network. Social capital and budgeting social capital focuses on natural processes boland and pondy, 1983, and is a broad and diverse topic that has been studied from a wide variety of perspectives. Establishing the conceptual foundation of social capital in organizations, nahapiet and ghoshal 1998, p.
The distinction between structural, cognitive, and relational social capital was made by janine nahapiet and sumantra ghoshal 1 and forms the most widely used and accepted framework for understanding social capital. Contextualising social capital in online brand communities 427. These dimensions are conceptual distinctions that are useful for analytic convenience but in practice social capital involves complex interrelations between the three dimensions. In particular, bearing in mind a notion that access to new information is the most. In an online community context, structural social capitalrepresents the. We argue that social capital provides access to external knowledge, which the firmspecific. Along these lines, we use nahapiet and ghoshal s 1998. Social capital, which is the goodwill and resources made available to an actor via reciprocal, trusting relationships adler and kwon, 2002. Nahapiet j ghoshal s 1998 academy of management 266 the central.
For this study, we used the definition of nahapiet and ghoshal 1998, for whom social capital is the sum of actual and potential risks involved. Tsai and ghoshal, 1998 and community levels chiu et al. Nov 17, 2009 due to social capital s influence upon the conditions needed for exchange and combination, social capital aids in the creation of intellectual capital. Organizational social capital scale based on nahapiet and. Social capital and the creation of collective knowledge. Social capital is a productive resource tsai and ghoshal, 1998, p. Likewise, social capital theory provides an equally compelling account of corporate sources of variations to this advantage. Inside the organization, social capital can reduce transactions costs, facili. Social capital, intellectual capital social capital. A detailed description of nahapiet and ghoshal s 1998 different dimensions of social capital and their significance follows later in the chapter.
Prior research suggests that the coevolution of social capital and knowledge underpin a firms competitive advantage. In this article we 1 integrate these different facets to define social capital in terms of three distinct dimensions. It seems improbably that one dimension of social capital could exist without presence of the other forms as well, such is the interconnected nature of the dimensions. Relational social capital describes the personal relationships individuals develop with one another based in a history of interactions that fulfill social motives such as sociability and prestige granovetter, 1992.
Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage janine nahapiet templeton college, university of oxford sumantra ghoshal london business school scholars of the theory of the firm have begun to emphasize the sources and conditions of what has been described as the organizational advantage, rather than focus. In particular, reputation has become fundamental in developing trust with the public and building a strong identity. Social capital refers to the network of relationships possessed by an individual or social unit and resources the embedded within the network a. Workplace social capital refers to the sum of the actual and potential resources embedded within, available though, and derived from the. Nahapiet and ghoshal 1998 determine three dimensions for social capital, and categorize them as structural, cognitive, and relational. Social capital dimensions for tacit knowledge sharing. Consequently, social capital characterised as distinctive knowledge stocks embedded in and distributed through individuals external and internal relationships adler and kwon, 2002 is a potential source of ambidexterity. The impact of employees perceived business ethics and. Pdf social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational. The present study examined the interrelationships among these three dimensions in an online social network context. The internal mechanisms of entrepreneurs social capital. Building on moran and ghoshal s 1996 formulation of. The contribution that this paper makes to the literature of social capital is its investigation of how one can optimize, as opposed to maximize, the various types of social capital woolcock, 1998, p. Organizational social capital, scale development, nahapiet and ghosal model, likert scale, scale.
Social relationships and the social capital therein, are an important influence on the development of both human. The role of organizational social capital in performance. In this paper, we seek to explain a firms absorptive capacity and disseminative capacity as the key mechanisms that drive the coevolution of a firms social capital and knowledge. Social capital s contribution is derived from both intra and interorganizational relationships. Dimensions of social capital structural, cognitive.
579 38 555 1407 1467 452 1387 328 237 1189 1115 641 1179 41 481 88 850 469 1356 1463 412 114 255 1060 527 1490 1203 811 800 76 33 1019 1249 872 150 516 157 95